Talk:Eleanor Mondale

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Cancer[edit]

I think she was diagnosed with cancer on May 31st 2005, not June 2005, source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/21/AR2005062100087.html

Why no pic?[edit]

I can't believe that Eleanor Mondale has a successful radio gig and not a promotional pic to be found anywhere. Jessemckay (talk) 23:35, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Death notices[edit]

I don't want to stifle people contributing to the article, but (with perhaps a stretch in interpretation) per WP:BLP I'm going to be reverting any additions of the death notice as vandalism. I know I've looked at all my usual death notice sources and cannot find anything, so its not like I haven't tried to source it myself when it was first brought up. If people can provide a definitive, reliable source then please do and we'll update the article. I have a tiny suspicion that someone somewhere confused Eleanor Mondale with Eleanor McGovern, who did indeed die on the date suggested...and updated the IMDB entry. Syrthiss 17:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I also tried to find mention of it on CNN, Yahoo News and MSNBC and there is nothing. I checked the obituaries in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune and there is nothing. MFNickster 19:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 07:24, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Triumph on MSNBC (2004).jpg[edit]

Image:Triumph on MSNBC (2004).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 02:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking consensus on notability of Mondale's past relationships[edit]

I'd like to seek consensus here on whether the fact that Mondale dated Warren Zevon, Ronald Perelman and James Belushi in the past. Twice, User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz has removed this as "unimportant gossip," and twice in the last 24 hours, I have reverted that user's edit. Lest I fall victim to the Three-revert rule or get into edit warring, I'd far prefer that we seek consensus here at this talk page. My rationale is simple: the definition of "gossip" is pretty subjective. This article has clearly sourced material from reliable sources, verifying that she dated these very noteworthy individuals. 69.209.219.54 29 September 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.209.219.54 (talk) 21:16, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See, for example, the parallel discussion at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive133#Jessica_Biel_Personal_section ans the followups. Wikipedia is not a repository for celebrity journalism; it is an encyclopedia. That half the personal life section is devoted Monica Lewinsky's supposed jealousy of Mondale and related rumor/speculation is wretched tabloidery. More needs to be removed from this article, rather than being restored. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:49, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Although this is seven years later, the first thing I noticed about this article was the gossipy tone in the personals section. It should justifiably reflect her marriages, but who she dated is irrelevant considering she is by now obscure.AlexanderSoul (talk) 21:55, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations[edit]

I believe that "allegations" of sexual relationships and rumors per se are inappropriate for an encyclopedia. In addition, the book in question has been discredited by the FBI. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonhomem (talk • contribs) 22:10, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Eleanor Mondale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:21, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]