Talk:Elaeocarpus grandis

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: New South Wales / Queensland / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Elaeocarpus grandis is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Neutrality[edit]

The wording of this article (especially the statements that are not supported by the quoted references) and the inclusion of references that do not deal with this taxon, suggest that it is written with a predetermined opinion that the taxon is invalid. There is no doubt that it is disputed, but given that the Australian, Queensland and New South Wales herbaria (i.e. those herbaria in the places where this species is proposed to exist), and additionally the respected authority Plants of the World Online, all accept this species there must be a better and more balanced point of view presented in the article. I will continue to work on that aspect but input from other editors is welcomed. Junglenut |Talk 10:17, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]