Talk:Effects of adoption on the birth mother

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lizzie's comments[edit]

This article is an in depth look at the effects of adoption on the birth mother. I felt it was informative and concise. There were some small grammatical errors and the writing style was a little weak. For example, the "e" in "effects" in the first sentence does not need to be capitalized. It is hard to vary nouns/pronouns used in an article like this but variation within "her" and "the mother" could be refreshing. All of the references look like the same article, is it possible to reference the specific page used so people can see exactly where the information came from? Other than that, I think this is a really solid article and I definitely learned a lot! Elk234 (talk) 20:39, 7 November 2014 (UTC)elk234Elk234 (talk) 20:39, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rose's comments[edit]

This was a good article, as it was very organized in the division of the supporting topics regarding the effects of adoption on the birth-mother. The only comment I have is that of the references listed, six of them are the same; therefore, there may need to be more diversity and a greater number of references. Other than that, however, I do think this article is well-constructed and informational. Rose0244 (talk) 20:39, 7 November 2014 (UTC)Rose0244[reply]

Jack's comments:[edit]

This article has more structure than is needed for the amount of information provided. The information itself is informative, clear, and comprehensive. The references should be more extensive. In general, the article gets the job done.

Audrey's Review[edit]

The article is very organized and thorough, especially the layout of the stages of grief. Also, the connection made to international adoption offers additional learning opportunities for readers. Under "Exploitation of birth mothers," are reports from countries such as Argentina based on a credible source? I do not notice any citations here. Is this based on the study referenced as the 8th? If so, I think it would be better to clarify that these studies are not independent research by having the citation immediately after first mentioning the studies. Moreover, I think the article could benefit tremendously, in terms of the richness of information, if it relied on more references than just three sources. Overall, a great job! Yeeboyeee (talk) 20:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Effects of adoption on the birth-mother. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Effects of adoption on the birth-mother. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:27, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Family Aspects of Disability[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2022 and 25 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sophiamartin613 (article contribs).