This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
User Ttocserp rightly tagged the first sentence of the Paraguay section as failing verification. The claim that in 1859 Thornton gave the order for the Paraguayan warship Jaguarí to be interfered with by two British warships is neither found in the reference given as currently accessible, nor was it in the archived page from 2012, when the edit was made by user Charles RB, who appears to have retired from editing. Neither is it exprssly given in the reference given for the rest of thhe paragraph. The RN action itself can be referenced, but I have not found anything yet to confirm Thornton's role, one way or the other, though my own sources on this are rather modest. It may be that, if not the Foreign Office papers, then the relevant Admiralty papers, were published in the 1860s. Davidships (talk) 04:18, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
