This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
The species articles should be merged here per WP:Palaeontology guidelines. An extinct trichopteran genus from the Jurassic is not going to have species level differences that warrant separate articles.--Kevmin§ 02:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense to me, though it strikes me as odd nothing been done about this in over a year... Anyway, it seems the only notable information the related species Dysoneura trifurcata even gave was the location, while this one has basically nothing (though it's from Russia it turns out). I've just cleaned up the Dysoneura article somewhat and added to it the locations of the individual species, so maybe now both species' articles can just be made redirects to Dysoneura? Monster Iestyn (talk) 17:35, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
For both, redirected as there was nothing to merge not already at the target. Klbrain (talk) 07:01, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
