This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
There are indications that the creator of this article works for this law firm. If so, that is a Paid violation as there has been no declaration. QuiteUnusual (talk) 13:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@QuiteUnusual: Could you be more specific? The article seems to be well-sourced so I wonder what made you think this way. Keivan.fTalk 21:44, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not without outing, no. I have asked the creator to respond to my concerns - nothing yet. QuiteUnusual (talk) 21:47, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've cleaned up the article; some of the claims were not in the sources given, which is a bit of a red flag. There are certainly many sources talking about Rotunno, but this might be a WP:BIO1E that could be redirected to Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse cases. It depends what coverage the other defence cases racked up - a search for sources is dominated by Weinstein. Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 18:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
