Talk:Lupçi i Poshtëm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 02 May 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. However, as the article was originally at Lupçi i poshtëm, and there is no consensus over which location the article should be at, it seems fair that it be returned to the original title and the mover (i.e. Zoupan) needs to gain consensus for their preferred title. Number 57 20:06, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Donje Ljupče, PodujevoLupçi i poshtëm – Article was originally at Lupçi i poshtëm. Zoupan (talk · contribs) moved it to Donje Ljupče (37) vs Lupçi i poshtëm (3), then moved the redirect over Donje Ljupče, then moved Donje Ljupče (37) vs Lupçi i poshtëm (3) to Talk:Donje Ljupče, Podujevo, then edited the original redirect, reventing others undoing this move. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 00:45, 10 May 2015 (UTC) – bobrayner (talk) 19:36, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). EdJohnston (talk) 20:09, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - It was not my intention to prevent undoing, "Donje Ljupče (37) vs Lupçi i poshtëm (3)" was obviously meant for the comment for the move, regarding Google Books hits. According to Common name, the article should be at Donje Ljupče, and not Donje Ljupče, Podujevo.--Zoupan 23:26, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, as per CM. I support a move to Donje Ljupče.--Zoupan 23:26, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support; we should return to the original title, rather than rewarding controversial, undiscussed moves. bobrayner (talk) 01:49, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose current is commonname look sources online. --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 07:59, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as per Bob Rayner we should return to the original title, rather than rewarding controversial, undiscussed moves In ictu oculi (talk) 11:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Donje Ljupče clearly has more hits. 23 editor (talk) 20:46, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.