Talk:Don-2N radar

Military history: Technology / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Russia: Technology & engineering / Military Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Don-2N radar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120123042059/http://www.rti-mints.ru/pro.htm to http://www.rti-mints.ru/pro.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:26, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not 1998 SIOP but during Reagan years[edit]

Just checked the Bulletin article written by Bret Lortie. In my interpretation the statement "The 1998 SIOP targeted this radar facility with 69 consecutive nuclear weapons." is not valid. Instead a caption on page 29 says: "At one point during the Reagan years, this above-ground radar ..., was targeted with 69 nuclear missiles". Accordingly, I propose to correct this sentence. Boevaya mashina (talk) 21:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The writing below the caption says "...March 15, 1998, New York Times Magazine, one particular target was slated to be hit by 69 consecutive nuclear weapons. At the time, Blair speculated that the target might have been a deeply buried command post at Chekhov. It turned out, Blair later told the magazine, the target was the Pushkino radar facility on the outskirts of Moscow. Defying common sense, a defense contractor had somehow managed to conclude that the above-ground radar facility was resilient enough to require a 69- missile attack." The actual source of the information is the New York Times magazine, as it's a secret document, and we don't actually know what was in it. Secretlondon (talk) 22:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What I wanted to say is: Reagan was president from 1981 to 1989. The SIOP in question was from Reagan years. The NYTimes article was from 1998 (Clinton years). But in Wikipedia we find the statement: "The 1998 SIOP targeted this radar ...". Which is clearly not what the bulletin says, but is probably a mix-up. Boevaya mashina (talk) 22:00, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]