Talk:Don't Touch That Dial/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 14:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

• Wikipedia:Short description: All mainspace articles should have a short description.
• Plot section is less than 400 words so it passes MOS:TVPLOT.
• "... sees a colorful toy helicopter" – it should be established that the world is in black-and-white
• Remove the commas after "outside the house", "bleeds in color", and "Vision in the series".
• "he used lighting to try create" → "he used lighting to try to create"
• "for Olsen to try mimic" → "for Olsen to try to mimic"
• Add a comma after "but because of COVID-19 restrictions".
• "Nielsen Media Research, who measure" → "Nielsen Media Research, which measures" (company)
• Add hyphens between "most watched", "most streamed", and "most viewed".
• "the top 0.2% or series" – typo?
• "had 9.3% share" → "had a 9.3% share"
• Be consistent with Comicbook.com or ComicBook.com.
• "Shannon Miller, Liz" → "Miller, Liz Shannon" (#37)
• Citation #49 is missing an author credit ("Seymour, Mike").
• Ping when done. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:33, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
  • All done except the short description and the black-and-white clarification in the plot summary, which I'll leave for another editor. —El Millo (talk) 02:51, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
    • Some Dude From North Carolina A short description is there, automatically added by the infobox. I tried to make a pass at the black and white clarification, but Adamstom.97 might want a go at it. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:04, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
      • Thanks team, I have made the black-and-white bit simpler but am open to trying other wording as well. - adamstom97 (talk) 04:29, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed