Talk:Don't Look a Smith Horse in the Mouth

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Animation Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rap Song[edit]

The rap song playing while Stan rides his SUV is: Juice (Know The Ledge)[1] by Eric B. & Rakim. --82.171.70.54 (talk) 01:12, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reception[edit]

Can't we get some more balance on the reception section? I don't see how this PTC should even really be considered a valid source of commentary for a tv show. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.233.159.197 (talk) 20:22, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to see the end of the reception sections, personally. The value of knowing which episodes the PTC thinks are bad is no greater or worse than the value of knowing which episodes IGN thinks are good. Neither have any meaningful authority when it comes to the quality of a given episode.172.191.0.170 (talk) 04:38, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here, here! The PTC has an agenda and bias of its own, and so is not to be trusted any more than if mentioning a review in a Murdoch/Fox owned newspaper! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.194.239.28 (talk) 15:45, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]