Talk:Domestos

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

How thick is the thick bleach CF other bleaches?--Light current 22:07, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Available chlorine levels[edit]

Its power is due to its high availability of chlorine (nominally 500,000 ppm, compared with 50,000 or less for other domestic bleaches}.

This is quite doubtful. Pure sodium hypochlorite pentahydrate (the active ingredient in chlorine-containing brands of Domestos) has an available chlorine content of some 43% (which equals 430,000 ppm). That would mean, that Domestos (a thickened and fragranced alkaline solution of sodium hypochlorite) is more concentrated than its active ingredient. Some solid shock chlorinating agents for pools, based on sodium dichloroisocyanurate or calcium hypochlorite have available chlorine levels in order of 50%/500,000 ppm. This assertion should be checked and corrected. Cheers, --93.192.169.26 (talk) 03:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"contains CTAC (TM)" (+ "Pink Power")[edit]

Anyone any notion what "contains CTAC (TM)" is thought to mean? (Chlorine-based Toilet Amenity Composition" for example? - or does it actually have an actual meaning?)

Also "Pink Power"? A reverse-Yorkie designation? ie indicating that women are permitted to use it? (or, better, that women have authority to choose to have someone else use it?) Or something to do with perfume etc?)

2.30.254.32 (talk) 12:27, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Domestos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110926152743/http://www.unilever.com.vn:80/brands/homecarebrands/vim/index.aspx to http://www.unilever.com.vn/brands/homecarebrands/vim/index.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Domestos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:39, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]