Talk:Doedicurus/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 22:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Criteria[edit]
3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass
4. Neutral ✓ Pass
5. Stable ✓ Pass
6. Illustrations ✓ Pass
7. Miscellaneous ✓ Pass
Comments[edit]
1.
- Link carapace in the lead, as well as the first mention in the prose. It's not that common of a term, at least for readers without a robust biology background (currently linked at the second point in the prose)
- done User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 20:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Link Smilodon at the first instance, rather than the second
- done User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 20:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Camels is a duplink
- fixed User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 20:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
2.
- Note a should probably have a citation directly attached to it, as it's making a statement that an assumption is incorrect. Even if it's from the same source as where the information in the sentence the note accompanies comes from, it should have a citation to make it clear where the information is coming from.
- done User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 20:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Spot check on the refs should all checked instances supported by the reference and all linked refs tests working.
3.
4.
5.
6.
- Image licensing looks good. Consider adding alt text, but that's not a GA requirement
7.
Placing on hold, just a little tightening up to do here. Good work. Hog Farm (talk) 18:27, 11 June 2020 (UTC)