Talk:Division of Mayo

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Australia: South Australia / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Division of Mayo is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of South Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

2004 results[edit]

Seeing as there was no redistribution in SA between the 2004 and 2007 elections, how is it that this page says the 2004 2PP was 61.81, yet here it says 63.59? Timeshift (talk) 13:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was 61.81 against independent candidate Brian Deegan, who beat Labor into the final round in 2004. In order to show the difference in percentage, the 2007 AEC has used the figure that would have appeared if Labor, rather than Deegan, had made it to that last round. (Similar to what happened in Calare in some ways.) Frickeg (talk) 04:41, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah of course. Silly me. Timeshift (talk) 10:16, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mayo, the happiest electorate in Australia[edit]

Mayo, the happiest electorate in Australia: InDaily 6 June 2016. Timeshift (talk) 22:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Xenophon, SA Best or Australia Best?[edit]

Since Nick Xenophon is renaming the 'Nick Xenophon Team' to 'Australia Best' (and with the state division being called 'South Australia (SA) Best'), should we change the Party data in the Members table? And if we did, what would we change it to? Australia Best or SA Best?

Keep in mind, 'Australia Best' is obviously the national name of the party, and 'SA Best' is the South Australian state division. The paradox here is that Mayo is in South Australia.

Thoughts? Frey's Fray (talk) 09:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not something we have to worry about until it actually happens, fortunately, which it hasn't yet - but having said that, it seems fairly clear that it would be "Australia Best" since this is the federal party we're talking about. There is no paradox. Frickeg (talk) 09:46, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can find no evidence that the party is not presently named "Nick Xenophon Team". In particular, Sharkie's parliamentary profile uses that name, and The AEC notices don't include a proposal to change the name. Any other name on the members or electorate pages is speculation. The ECSA list doesn't include any relevant party, and John Darley is officially independent. --Scott Davis ^Talk 12:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Division of Mayo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160122073818/https://nxt.org.au/candidates/south-australia/house-of-representatives/ to https://nxt.org.au/candidates/south-australia/house-of-representatives/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]