Talk:Discovery and development of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors

A fact from Discovery and development of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 November 2008 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that inhibitors of the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-4 can prevent the degradation of gastrointestinal hormones that regulate insulin release from the pancreas, making them effective anti-diabetic drugs?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/November.

Wikipedia

Merge?[edit]

A merge with the Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors article may be a good idea. We don't need two separate articles. --PFHLai (talk) 15:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is quite an extensive article, merging would cause WP:UNDUE weight in the main article for now. I don't think a merger would be appropriate. See also: WT:PHARM. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 19:25, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at WT:PHARM#University project?. --PFHLai (talk) 13:25, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with Steven's comment about not merging

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Development_of_dipeptidyl_peptidase-4_inhibitors

with

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipeptidyl_peptidase-4_inhibitor

I had nothing to do with writing or editing either article, but I am a physician who teaches pharmacology in a major US medical school and have discussed them with my students. The first article is outstanding in quality and scope - very useful to both me and my students. The second is skeletal, almost useless, and little more than a redirection page. I also looked at the WP:UNDUE criteria that Steven cites as a reason for not merging them, and I disagree that it would apply to a merged article. Verytas (talk) 17:26, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Discovery and development of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121017204733/http://www.biomedcentral.com/render/render.asp?arx_id=cd-921157&type=pdf&access=denied to http://www.biomedcentral.com/render/render.asp?arx_id=cd-921157&type=pdf&access=denied

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:35, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]