Talk:Diodorus of Tarsus

A fact from Diodorus of Tarsus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 December 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Diodore of Tarsus mentored both the sainted John Chrysostom and the heretical Theodore of Mopsuestia?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/December.

Wikipedia

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Diodore & Nestorianism[edit]

This statement confuses me: "The Christology of Diodore was condemned as heretical by later generations, most explicitely at a local synod in Constantinople in 399 which described Diodore's views as Nestorian." What I don't understand is that Nestorius wasn't even in a position to express his views until 428, when he became Patriarch of Constantinople! I'm not sure what happened here: was the source misquoted, or was that source mistaken -- or was the synod somehow predict what would happen a generation later? -- llywrch 02:48, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I hadn't caught that. A one-number typo on my part put the synod into the wrong century. Fixed now (council was 499, not 399), the source was right, my eyes were wrong. Pastordavid 16:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diodorus of Tarsus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130512105612/http://hellbusters.8m.com/upd18.html to http://hellbusters.8m.com/upd18.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:06, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]