This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (It is factually correct and multiple re-writes have ensured the listing is encyclopaedic) --Tomhillman (talk) 16:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
While this likely fails based on quality of refs (effectively mostly interviews and rewritten press releaes, the best I could find is half-interview stuff like [1]), Alexa rank in Top 300 or so probably means it is useful to have an entry on it and it can be argued it has 'significant worldwide impact' or whatever. This is a note on why I am NOT tagging it with notability, nor nominating this for AfD, despite refs being poor and the author likely a paid-for SPA. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:26, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
