Talk:Dielectric absorption

Electronics Mid‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

DA in Double-layer capacitors[edit]

For double-layer capacitors, there are only rare sources for figures of the dielectric absorption voltage. One of it "Sanda Lo, Energy Storage Device: Ultra-capacitor, University of Central Florida, Orlando" [[1]] claims EDLC's have the highest dielectric absorption of all the capacitor types. Perhaps here there is a misinterpretation. Since double-layer capacitors have no dielectric in the true sense, a "dielectric absorption" is hard to imagine. The low mobility of the charge carrier, the ions in the liquid electrolyte aligned with the narrow pore structure of the electrodes leads to very long charging and discharging times. Remaining charge could be the reason for a misinterpretation.

They may have thought that DA was of no interest. d-layer caps are not used in any application where DA would be of interest, either for safety or performance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.25.173.60 (talk) 22:37, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because I never found any figures for the DA on the data sheets of a lot of manufacturers I deleted any remark and figure regarding EDLC's in this article. --Elcap (talk) 14:11, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reference mess[edit]

The fourth reference looks like a mess, at least at high zoom levels in a web browser.

And why the star in the first reference?

--Mortense (talk) 14:13, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This explanation for DA makes little sense to me. Real dipoles in polymers (for example) do not flip, they bend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.135.247.203 (talk) 00:43, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dielectric absorption. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

have changed web-archive links into original AVX links --Elcap (talk) 12:13, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dielectric absorption. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121105021659/http://www.wima.de/EN/characteristics.htm to http://www.wima.de/EN/characteristics.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]