Talk:Dhantoli

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 April 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Maharashtra Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	This article needs a map. Please work with the Maps workgroup, to create and add a map to this article. Once the requested map is added, remove the `map-needed` parameter.
	This article was last assessed in April 2013.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Improvements[edit]

This article needs significant improvement:

Removal of unverifiable and subjective information ("... is the best residential area...")
Additional, reliable citations

It would be useful to cite sources such the 2011 Census and an administrative body [the state government, the Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC), and the like]. The Maharashtra state gazette and the Nagpur district gazette are likely to have vast and reliable reference material on Dhantoli. Unfortunately, pages related to Nagpur were taken down from the online archive of the state gazette last year. One could reference information from a physical copy. Rohini (talk) 08:14, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Medical Hub section[edit]

I think that this section should probably be removed as failing a number of policies including WP:V. Drbkmurali has a clear COI with the subject. LGA _talk^edits 21:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]