Talk:Dhanak

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Copyediting the whole article[edit]

Hello everybody! So, I think we have a bit of a conflict here. What I essentially did was remove the clutter, restructure the English, remove unverifiable resources, unsourced material, poorly written lead section, and IMDb links from the article. But, Palmygluts maintains that I disrupted the article. Can we have a discussion here, please? Since Cyphoidbomb and newly elected admin Oshwah look like people who have recently edited the article, can we have some comments, please? Also, this was added in my talk page this evening. Best, Nairspechtive Talk 06:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nairspecht - Cyphoidbomb made one revision to the article with good faith concerns, and I don't see where I've edited the article at all. I don't quite understand your concerns... can you elaborate more so that I can help you? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:49, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oshwah, 1 July 2016 via Huggle. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:53, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) - I think the person who should be commenting here is the brand new editor who seems curiously possessive of this article. I don't see any glaring issues with your changes. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:51, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! I mistook your (Oshwah's) edit test revert as an edit. Anyways, I think it's sorted now, thanks to Cyphoidbomb, unless Palmygluts has some opinions. Thank you for your time, both of you. See you around. Best, Nairspechtive Talk 06:53, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nairspecht - No problem. Glad we could assist you. Have a great rest of your day, Nairspecht :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]