Talk:Denys Lasdun

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Denys Lasdun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:51, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IBM Building, South Bank, London[edit]

Grade II-listed on 19/6/2020. Some more info on Lasdun in the listing particulars. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 22:24, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sincere or Ironic Praise from John Betjeman[edit]

The second sentence in the paragraph https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denys_Lasdun#Late_work states "King Charles compared it to a nuclear power station but it was popular with other traditionalists, with John Betjeman writing Lasdun a letter in praise of its design." However, according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_National_Theatre#Architecture, the letter John Betjeman wrote to Lasdun "praising" him was ironic: "John Betjeman, a man not noted for his enthusiasm for brutalist architecture, wrote to Lasdun stating ironically that he "gasped with delight at the cube of your theatre in the pale blue sky and a glimpse of St Paul's to the south of it. It is a lovely work and so good from so many angles...it has that inevitable and finished look that great work does.""

Clearly only one of these articles is correct, since the former states the praise was sincere while the latter states the praise was ironic. If the latter is correct then it would invalidate the former's entire paragraph thesis that "it was popular with other traditionalists", or at least requiring some other proof of this popularity. 143.177.112.154 (talk) 14:45, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]