Talk:Dennis Toeppen
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 September 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Questionable edits by 162.220.89.246[edit]
Over the past day, 162.220.89.246 (talk) made a couple of questionable edits to this page and the Suburban Express talk page page. He removed information taken from a Chicago Tribune article, and he deleted the "" tag on the "Links related to Controversy" section on the Suburban Express talk page. Also, his comments sound like ones that would be written by a Suburban Express employee. I'm concerned that he might be another Suburban Express sockpuppet. Gulugawa (talk) 23:51, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Lawsuit by State of Illinois[edit]
I believe information regarding lawsuit against Suburban Express probably belongs in the Suburban Express article and not here. I'll defer to others. 98.228.62.102 (talk) 01:45, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
After digging deeper, I am more certain this does not belong. It appears as if the attorney who withdrew was representing Suburban Express. I see no evidence that the attorney was representing Toeppen personally. Court records (on PACER) show that Toeppen has been representing himself Pro Se. 98.228.62.102 (talk) 02:50, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- The sources used are generally considered reliable, and the lawsuit applies to Suburban and Toeppen. To take from the lead of the news-gazette article, "The lawyer for Suburban Express owner Dennis Toeppen wants to withdraw as counsel". That is pretty clear- if not, take it up with the news gazette or produce sources that indicate otherwise. The MAICO lawsuit specifically mentions Toeppen. tedder (talk) 15:28, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- I sort of see your point. But by your logic, the entire Suburban Express article belongs on the Dennis Toeppen page because Dennis Toeppen is the owner of Suburban Express. There is an article for Suburban Express and there is an article for Dennis Toeppen. I can't speak for everyone, but I think Wikipedia is more useful if it's not a commingled mess. 98.228.62.102 (talk) 23:25, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello Wikipedians (?) I spent some time checking and correcting sources and aligning article language with the sources. If you have any comments, let's meet here and talk. I think the third paragraph of the bus transportation section doesn't belong in this BLP.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.143.160.53 (talk) 23:35, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- 107.77.209.215 (talk) 02:30, 19 August 2023 (UTC) Removed some vandalism - low quality additions that were off-topic and somewhat unhinged. For instance, author made bizarre claims regarding "google articles".