Talk:Demographics of Novi Sad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"According to the 1910 census, the city had 33,590 inhabitants, of which 13,343 (39.72%) most frequently spoke Hungarian language, 11,594 (34.52%) Serbian language, 5,918 (17.62%) German language, 1,453 (4.33%) Slovak language, etc. [9] It is not certain whether Hungarians or Serbs were largest ethnic group in the city in this time, since 1910 census is considered partially inaccurate by most historians because this census did not recorded the population by ethnic origin or mother tongue, but by the "most frequently spoken language", [10] thus the census results overstated the number of Hungarian speakers, since this was official language at the time and many non-Hungarian native speakers stated that they most frequently speak Hungarian language in everyday communication."

Whoever wrote this, doesn't understand why Kingdom of Hungary was so strong. The main strenght came from the diversity. Most people living there who never had any "blood" connection to Hungarians were proud Hungarians (ie. Kossuth and Petofi, also Karoly Kos, Festetich, Grassalkovich, etc.) Today, influenced by nationalism, we don't understand this. Abdulka 16:22, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject:Hungary tag[edit]

I am restoring this tag because the city at several times formed part of the Kingdom of Hungary or Republic of Hungary, and had (at the very least) a large Hungarian minority for much of the 19th century and into the 20th. Also, I think the tag should be removed only by persons from Wikiproject:Hungary, if they decide that really the project has no interest in this article.Brianyoumans (talk) 15:13, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Demographic history of Novi Sad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]