Talk:Death Tunnel

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 2 November 2022, see discussion.
keep, 10 April 2006, see discussion.

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Nonnotable[edit]

Non-notable independent film. IMDB cautions "Note: Many of the "reviews" for this incredibly poor film seem to be written by people who actually worked on this film or were hired to promote it." --John Nagle 05:07, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. The hatnote to Tunnel of Death appears to have resolved this issue. Baileypalblue (talk) 11:43, 18 April 2009 (UTC) ~~~~[reply]

Death Tunnel → Death Tunnel (movie) — "Death Tunnel" should disambiguate between Tunnel de la mort and this page. — Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 11:05, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Oppose. The correct move (per naming conventions) would be to Death Tunnel (film), but I think a hatnote should be sufficient. PC78 (talk) 12:37, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Use a hatnote for now, as Death Tunnel is the primary topic right now. Propose the move later if the amount of views at Tunnel de la Mort becomes significant compared to Death tunnel. ƒingers^on_Roids 15:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Only 1 article is known as Death Tunnel in English (which this is the English encyclopedia). If this was the French Wiki, maybe. Plus, when there are only 2 articles it is always recommended to do a HATLINK instead. TJ Spyke 20:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support there are several tunnels that have been nicknamed death tunnel or tunnel of death including war crimes slavery constructed tunnels. In regards to traffic, in addition to the intersection in Montreal, there's the Lefortovo tunnel in Moscow, etc. 70.29.213.241 (talk) 04:20, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a dab page at Tunnel of Death for these. Station1 (talk) 06:01, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It didn't exist when I registered my opinion. 70.29.213.241 (talk) 11:29, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't noticed you just created the page. I think it's a good solution to the problem, though. Station1 (talk) 05:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.