Talk:David Pearson (racing driver)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleDavid Pearson (racing driver) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 14, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 23, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that David Pearson (pictured) set the NASCAR single-season win percentage record by winning 11 of the 18 events that he entered in 1973?
In the newsA news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on November 15, 2018.

Acting?[edit]

A "David Pearson" is credited as having small roles in both Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever, and Almost Heroes. I am highly skeptical that either of these are him, but in both cases the editors of the articles on the films linked to this David Pearson. That is probably because David Pearson should have been a disambig page the entire time, but wasn't for a while, and the movie editors didn't check the link target. But, for all I know, NASCAR David really does do cameos in bad movies.  :-/ — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 12:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's highly unlikely. He's known to be quiet which is why he isn't as well known as his all-time great peers like Richard Petty, Jeff Gordon, Bobby Allison, and Darrell Waltrip. That brings out a point - I need to discuss his personality. Royalbroil 13:16, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some notes by Ched[edit]

Lead
  • Pearson's career paralleled Richard Petty's, the winningest driver in NASCAR history.[4] ... thinking.

Ched :  ?  22:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Meaning that they raced for many of the same years against each other and they were chief rivals of each other. I was hoping to attach Petty's significance to this thought but it could be separated. Good job with the ALT image descriptions. Royalbroil 03:09, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yea - the more I think about the sentence ... the more I REALLY like it! It was just one of those sentences that said so much with so few words. It made me think. :-) — Ched :  ?  13:07, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:David Pearson (NASCAR driver)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:39, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overall this is a very good article, though I do have some issues:

  • "Pearson began racing in NASCAR during the 1960 season shortly after winning the 1959 track champion at Greenville-Pickens Speedway." The last section basically ended at 1952, so the jump is a little jarring. What was he doing in 1959 and beforehand, is that noted somewhere?
    I spent months researching this article, including getting every NASCAR book at the local library. I couldn't find anything from any source (online or paper) during this time period. Not even anything from an unreliable source. I dug high and low - including the NY Times, NASCAR, google books, numerous newspaper sources.
  • "When Pearson bent the frame of the his own race car early in the 1961 season, he began working as a house roofer in Spartanburg to support his family, which included his two sons." So was he married? If so when?
    I watched for information about a wife while searching and couldn't find a mention. Not too surprising considering how private is his. I think we need to be very careful about adding living spouses since maintaining privacy about non-public people (the spouse) is important. I bet I wouldn't have been able to find out his children's names if the sons weren't higher profile NASCAR people. So I would argue against naming the non-public spouse even if I had found something.
    I kept digging and found something - a resolution from the South Carolina legislature. I added information on his wife - she was dead in 2000.
  • "The 1970 season started with Pearson competing part-time, like he would for the rest of his career." Any specific reason as to why he mvoed to part time?
  • I was looking specifically for this reason the entire time (too) and wasn't able to come up with anything on it. Since you posted this, I looked at a website that I had encountered in the past (which was unknown reliability). It is the only source that I'm aware which lists series that stock car drivers might commonly race in [1] like ASA, ARTGO, sports cars, USAC Stock cars, IndyCars, etc. It only shows a few American Speed Association events and a few sports car races.
  • 1973 feels a little short given that he was the nascar driver of the year.
    checkY Done
  • I'd spell IROC out on its first mention.
    checkY Done
  • "Pearson was one of the 25 nominees for the first class to be inducted in the NASCAR Hall of Fame." When was the first class inducted?
    checkY Done
  • Saw a few punctuation issues, though I think I got all of them.
    Thank you! Royalbroil 05:22, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll put the article on hold for a few days, and will pass it when the issues are fixed. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:39, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You bring up good points about things that I just can't find. I don't know what to say to you about the remaining points. I was aware of each of them the entire time that I was rewriting the article from scratch and I tried very hard to find content for each of these missing points. I couldn't find a book written about him which might include these details, just a chapter or two in some google books. There's an author with the same name which makes finding a biography very challenging. I'll keep looking, but if you have to fail the GA because of these points then so be it. You need to decide if it's complete enough at the GA level - I'm sure it's not at the FA level. Royalbroil 14:09, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Given this issues, it's unlikely that it could be an FA. However, I feel that there's enough comprehensive info in the article to consider it a GA, so it passes. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:48, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on David Pearson (racing driver). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:39, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]