Talk:Dan Gordon (animator)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Hi...I wrote this article for my blog, and I have added the words "I, Sherm Cohen, am the author of this article, "Dan Gordon -A Brush With Greatness," and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 and later." to my blog post at

http://cartoonsnap.blogspot.com/2009/01/dan-gordon-biography-life-and-work-of.html

Please let me know if I need to do anything else to share this information on Wikipedia. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramblindawg (talkcontribs) 22:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Received message at Ticket:2009021210066093. There's a GFDL release on the blog but it needs to be v1.2 or later. Stifle (talk) 21:54, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is ramblindawg...I have gone back and added even more GFDL release information. It links to the 1.3 license. I have tried to include everything. Please let me know if I need to add anything else to share this information. Thanks. ramblindawg Ramblindawg (talk) 19:07, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update and correction: I have added the words "I, Sherm Cohen, am the author of this article, "Dan Gordon -A Brush With Greatness," and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." to my blog post at

http://cartoonsnap.blogspot.com/2009/01/dan-gordon-biography-life-and-work-of.html Ramblindawg (talk) 20:02, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Received and noted. Stifle (talk) 21:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:21, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]