Talk:Damage controlman

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Damage controlman article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Picture[edit]

Since the article is centered on what a damage controlman is/does, shouldn't a picture of some damage controlman in action be the profile photo instead of just a high-ranking enlisted damage controlman in whites at ground zero? I'd be glad to upload a few personal ones.136.160.157.190 (talk) 20:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC) Ex-DCman 1546EST-25mar08[reply]

Done. I added a picture of DC's welding. Medicjm (talk) 08:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rating History[edit]

This is a real weak article. For the US Navy, Damage controlman as a rating has not consistently existed, It has undergone periods of disestablishment. That information should get added. I write and think of this from the United States Navy perspective= what about other larger Nation's navies? Wfoj3 (talk) 22:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]