Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
Oppose The book is notable and so a separate article is reasonable. Andrew D. (talk) 21:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In that case should the details of the book be removed from the article and replaced by a wikilink? Jonathan A Jones (talk) 21:50, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What the page needs most is expansion to include her more recent book Making Good Progress? and her new role at No More Marking. The work on automating comparative assessment looks to be of value to Wikipedia. Andrew D. (talk) 07:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That's probably true, but what's clear is that this information about Seven Myths about Education doesn't belong on two separate pages. Either the details are part of the Daisy Christodoulou article, in which case the separate page should be deleted, or they belong on a separate page, in which case they don't belong here. While I prefer merging to a single page I'm happy with either option, but what can't be justified is having it both ways. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 15:10, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have deleted the repeated material so that the two articles are now distinct (though both very short) and withdrawn the merge proposal. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 07:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. The source discusses "readiness for new national examinations", but I have just folded this in to "asessment reform" for simplicity. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 09:48, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]