Talk:DWFM

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Radio Stations Mid‑importance

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Personalities and Programming section discussion[edit]

@Corkythehornetfan: @Atlantic306: @WayKurat: (for your comments) : Look I'm not declaring an edit war here, but if you really think I'm declaring such things then go ahead and think that way. But based on my observation here, at some point many of radio station related articles doesn't contain too much personalities and at some point programmings. Maybe you should check further for some articles that relies too much on some editors that only adding more personalities which is no longer relevant and mostly not important to those articles. And more importantly (and somehow abusive), there are some contributors here that keeps adding such personalities which is unexisted on a particular station. If you asked me this is too much as per NOTRADIOGUIDE rules. Just take a good look on WBMP, DWRR-FM, DWET-FM, and KDIS, are they still inputting a personalities to those articles? They previously contained a DJ's / personalities, even programmings on those articles, but somehow removed as they said that they're referring to NOTDIRECTORY rule. Here are some revisions made for both DWRR-FM, and DWET-FM for your reference:

For DWRR-FM revisions.

1
2
3
4
5
6

For DWET-FM revisions.

1
2

Corkythehornetfan some of these revisions I've presented here was also your responsibility to remove them as you stated that they're violated WP:LISTPEOPLE, WP:NOTRADIOGUIDE, WP:UNSOURCED, WP:ELNO. So why do I think I also decide to remove such personalities and programmings in the first place? Maybe you should review some of your edits on those other Philippine radio stations too as you're also the one who is responsible for removal of them. I'm not engaging a war here, I'm basing on your revisions you've made on these revised article links I've presented here. Hamham31 Heke!KushKush! 23:11, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at this really good B class article BBC Radio 4 it has information about present and former presenters and information on programming.Atlantic306 (talk) 23:25, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Very well then, but my big question is why did Corkythehornetfan removed (some) of the notable personalities on some radio station related article (among them are DJ's on FM Radio, programming, and notably some of Filipino news Personalities on AM station related articles) in the first place? Hamham31 Heke!KushKush! 23:33, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notable people are allowed to be included in the article, assuming they are Wiki-notable. I removed the two that were notable because most likely I thought it was wasn't worth including only two people. That was a year ago, so I really don't remember the reason for the two. If you think the two should be included, then re-add them. Days and times or the programming schedule should not be included because of NOTRADIOGUIDE. Corkythehornetfan 01:23, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK now that makes sense. OK I will let this discussion closed, as agreement. But if they will gonna re-add those notable peoples, make sure that they really existed on that station, cause I feel that someone will be re-adding those imaginary DJ's or Personalities which I would like that to stop. Also, I will no longer removing those personalities then. @Corkythehornetfan: Can you also be part of our discussion at DZXL's talk page? Sems to me that MSJapan keeps redirecting the page to Radio Mindanao Network without any valid consensus. Hamham31 Heke!KushKush! 01:39, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you are sure an entry is a hoax you are correct to remove it but not to remove the genuine ones imo Atlantic306 (talk) 15:23, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on DWFM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131224111513/http://n5e.interaksyon.com/top/4EA1A901A12646E/1001/bagong-tahanan-ng-tv5-sa-mandaluyong-silipin to http://n5e.interaksyon.com/top/4EA1A901A12646E/1001/bagong-tahanan-ng-tv5-sa-mandaluyong-silipin

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]