Talk:DIII-D (tokamak)

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force.

On 30 March 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to DIII-D. The result of the discussion was not moved.

DIII and D[edit]

Was it an upgrade to DIII ? Is the 2nd D for Divertor ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates[edit]

I believe the given coordinates are incorrect. I think the fusion reactor is here: 32.902251, -117.228856. — ★Parsa ☞ talk 03:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

DIII-D is not a fusion reactor.
It is a tokamak used to investigate how to best build a fusion reactor. The page should be moved to DIII-D (tokamak). — Preceding unsigned comment added by EmiliaWiki (talk • contribs) 13:05, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done. I agree with this and I've performed the move. -- AquaDTRS (talk) 00:41, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you EmiliaWiki (talk) 09:43, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 30 March 2024[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 03:42, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DIII-D (tokamak) → DIII-D – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. GZWDer (talk) 18:26, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Google and views[[1]] doesn't suggest this is the primary topic so the base name should be retargeted to DIII. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.