Talk:Curley Christian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Nikkimaria (talk). Self-nominated at 15:16, 10 April 2021 (UTC).[reply]

My review of this:

Article

  • NewcheckY Published 10 April, 2021
  • Long enough checkY the prose portion exceeds 1,500 characters
  • Within policycheckY appears neutral, cites sources with inline citations, appears free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism per Earwig

Hook Format – it is fewer than 200 characters and might be. interesting to a broad audience The hook fact is accurate and cited with an inline citation in the article neutral and does not focus unduly on negative aspects of living people. However, ALT1 might need rewording, as to make it more clear that he is the only veteran to survive a quadruple amputation during the war (not to survive a quadruple amputation, period).

  • QPQunsure of this right now checkY per MeegsC's findings, passes

SecretName101 (talk) 18:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • SecretName101, the QPQ looks fine; Nikkimaria actually did far more than needed for a single QPQ. Is that all you were waiting for? If so, can you please give this one its tick so that it can be moved to the "approved nominations" queue? Thanks. MeegsC (talk) 14:28, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Passes. Will move to "approved nominations". SecretName101 (talk) 19:07, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding tick, per SecretName101's pass, so nomination moves properly. MeegsC (talk) 21:34, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]