Talk:Cumulus Networks

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 November 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Request for non-primary source - not possible[edit]

On the article someone added a 'non-primary source required' at the line: Cumulus claims that its Switch operating system is different from other network Operating Systems because it IS Linux and offers the entirety of the Linux experience

But this is a quote from the vendor ('Cumulus claims') which is per definition (only) source by themselves. Otherwise it could have been mentioned as a fact (even though this is an opinion - but then at least it could say 'network administrators say...' or something; but here it is clear that it is 'cumulus claims' - so either the sentence should be removed or the request for non-primary resource should be removed. I did remove the request for npr : but feel free to remove entire sentence if you (whoever that is) thinks that statement is advertising. (I'm not from Cumulus nor a big supporter of it....). Cheers. Tonkie (talk) 16:01, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cumulus Networks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130627120922/http://cumulusnetworks.com:80/press_releases/detail/20130619-cumulus-networkstm-brings-the-power-of-linux-to-networking/ to http://cumulusnetworks.com/press_releases/detail/20130619-cumulus-networkstm-brings-the-power-of-linux-to-networking/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:47, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]