This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
"Left-leaning"? Also, is this really notable?[edit]
I actually found the book to be rather impartial -- the only reasons it could be considered left-leaning are because it includes Israel and the US among its list of "irritating" states, and it's reasonably easy to make the case for both countries. In addition, I own a copy, I rather like the book, but I have to think it isn't really notable enough for a Wikipedia article Haikupoet (talk) 19:14, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
