Talk:Cuban War of Independence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bias[edit]

“Martí’s impatience to start the revolution for independence was affected by his growing fear that the imperialist forces in the United States would succeed in annexing Cuba before the revolution could liberate the island from Spain”.[11]

Really? Then why on earth did the rebels eagerly accept, rather than reject, U.S. intervention? Moreover, why earth would it matter when the revolution succeeded or not if the U.S. wanted to annex it anyway?

A new trend of aggressive US “influence”, evinced by Secretary of State James G. Blaine’s expressed ideals that all of Central and South America would some day fall to the U.S.

Evidence?

“That rich island”, Blaine wrote on 1 December 1881, “the key to the Gulf of Mexico, is, though in the hands of Spain, a part of the American commercial system… If ever ceasing to be Spanish, Cuba must necessarily become American and not fall under any other European domination”.[12] Blaine’s vision did not allow the existence of an independent Cuba.

Really? How do you get that? All he said was that Cuba could not be controlled by "other Europeans". Even if he did say that, why does it matter, considering that he was not secretary of state in 1895-98?

CJK (talk) 21:43, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How was the header image for this page chosen? Images for other wars of independence (American, Greek, Argentine, to name a few) feature paintings or collages regarding victories, charges, armies—rather than starvation and the negative impacts of the respective wars. The inconsistency here seems to reflect some bias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.66.12.131 (talk) 00:07, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. Do you have an idea for a better image? Maybe something from commons:Category:Cuban War of Independence? groupuscule (talk) 00:34, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clarifications needed[edit]

"After deliberations with patriotic clubs across the United States, the Antilles and Latin America, “El Partido Revolucionario Cubano” (The Cuban Revolutionary Party) was officially proclaimed on April 10, 1892." Deliberations by whom? Proclaimed by whom, where and why?Nemo Impune (talk) 13:47, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

“Martí’s impatience to start the revolution for independence was affected by his growing fear that the imperialist forces in the United States would succeed in annexing Cuba before the revolution could liberate the island from Spain”. Why is this in quotes?Nemo Impune (talk) 13:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Improvement Needed[edit]

The Background section does not provide any background on Spain's situation, only the United States, Jose Marti and Cuban rebels jockeying for position in Cuba.Nemo Impune (talk) 13:54, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to make some edits to this page, but I'm a new user. Here are my specific ideas:

In introduction add "Historians also disagree on the extent to which United States intervention caused the victory against Spain." Marti section add: "Marti was also notable for his nationalist poetry, which remains well studied to this day. Best known among his works is Yo Soy un Hombre Sincero, one such nationalist piece." PRC section add: Marti’s organization reached out to countless foreign leaders and influential persons of the day, gathering support from all over the Americas, especially seeking support from Cuban ex-patriates in the United States. Montecristi section add: Spaniards were not to be seen as objects of hatred, The war was not to be one of conquest, but independence. Mambises section: Free black soldiers fought in their own units, not necessarily commanded by creole or white officers under the promise of emancipation. During the War of Independence, the Mambises were led by Antonio Maceo, the second-in-command of the insurgent forces. While a large proportion of the insurgency as a whole was black, the Mambises were particularly notable because so many of them were former slaves. About wealthy slaveholders: While wealthy Cubans did for the most part support the colonial government, some were sympathetic to the revolutionary cause either because economic or political convictions. End of mamby paragraph: ...and continued using it in the wars to come. About guerrilla tactics: These sorts of attacks were characteristic of the Mambises, who were known to lack weapons as they were primarily a home-grown rather than invasive force. Weyler Paragraph: Weyler was also known for having learned such tactics during his time in the Ten Years’ War, his “reconcentration” tactics had been in use for some time. After "General Shafter": His exclusion reflected a broader trend of American forces operating independently of insurgent forces. After "Surrender Ceremonies": U.S. occupation of Cuban territory would continue in years to come, its independence subject to American influence. End of Analysis: Regardless, U.S. intervention undoubtedly broke any stalemate which could have arisen from the situation as it was. While the insurgency had progressed well beyond its geographical expanse in The Ten Years’ War, it remained to be seen whether Spain could have refocused its efforts and stopped the rebellion’s momentum. Bsaxl1 (talk) 02:03, 14 May 2018 (UTC)User: Bsaxl1[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:58, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cuban War of Independence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:40, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:51, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

British involvement?[edit]

The article on Churchill implies his cavalry troop were involved on the Spanish side. Was this officially sanctioned? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.22.46.1 (talk) 08:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cuban_War_of_Independence&oldid=1195088215"