Talk:Crack the Skye

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Anticipation[edit]

Yeah, I'm excited about this album. But reading the plot synopsis, all I can really say is... "WHAT?!" Kingoomieiii (talk) 04:49, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

should be a good album cant wait till it comes out (Seth4000 (talk) 12:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)) Seth4000[reply]

youtube[edit]

It's been out for a few days now, and still no videos of the tracks on youtube? Is the record label/youtube suppressing the uploading of them or has no one uploaded any yet? Zaruyache (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC).[reply]

im not sure... ive seen one upload of "oblivion" but thats pretty much all i can find. anyway. i bought the album... its VERY good (in my opinion). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.222.180.37 (talk) 01:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Critical Reception[edit]

The critical reception section omits any negative responses. Somebody should edit in some less partisan commentary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.4.132.31 (talk) 05:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sputnikmusic gave it a low score of 2. [1] FireCrystal (talk) 05:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That was such a BS review. If you wanta partisan opinion, don't include sputnkimusic's review. That review was completely biased from the start —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.253.200.153 (talk) 18:38, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, if you omit the only negative review you will in fact have an artificially partisan opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.210.248.63 (talk) 19:43, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Sputnik Music review is completely worthless it's as relevant as posting an amazon.com review, it's less relevant than a blog review it's just garbage user generated content. I understand that some idiots may feel that negative reviews are needed to balance out positive ones but that is in no way encyclopedic and including a trash review like that does more to hurt this article than not including criticisms. I'm sick and tired of seeing these shit sputnik music reviews posted on wikipedia and I certainly believe it should be removed from this article as well as all others as it is not notable at all.

Professional reviews[edit]

metacritic.com Canniba loki 19:24, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Crack the Skye at Rock Sound Canniba loki 06:05, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Crack the Skye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140109151521/http://www.webcitation.org/5ukpVQvBT to http://www.ariacharts.com.au/pages/charts_display.asp?chart=1G50
Corrected formatting/usage for http://stereogum.com/archives/progress-report/progress-report-mastodon_038461.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Crack the Skye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:57, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]