Talk:Corporate law/Archives/2015

Reverting and the Formation of the Act section

@HUMMERTON beach, Corsschekcboogie, Thomas.W, 188.29.218.27, CAPTAIN RAJU, Bongwarrior, and Bichbarbar:

Recently, there has been a lot of reverting going on (see here), removing and re-adding the Formation of the Act section (starts The Act was first introduced to Parliament as the Consumer Credit Bill at the beginning of November 1970, and initially ran to 298 pages. It was given its second reading on 14 November...), this section does deal with corporate law in the UK, but because there has been a lot of reverting going on, I didn't want to re-add it (it is currently not in the article).

I thought it would be best - before we more permanently add or remove the section - to reach consensus on whether it would be good to have the section in the article. Some of the reasons for reverting are: how is that even relevant here????????????, Poppycock, You aint no admin sunshine, Rv removal of sourced content, a direct continuation of behaviu they were blocked for yesterday.. I have {{ping}}ed the users involved in the reverting. The section mentioned can be found here (bottom of the diff on the left). Thanks.  Seagull123  Φ  16:42, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

@Seagull123: Of the ones you pinged everyone but me, Bongwarrior and CAPTAIN RAJU have been blocked as vandals, so you won't get many replies. It doesn't belong in the article, though, as you might see if you read it carefully. It's nonsense added by HUMMERTON beach, an editor who has been confirmed by a checkuser as being the same person as Corsschecboogie and Bichbarbar. Which is why I didn't readd it when Bichbarbar was being taken care of. Thomas.W ^talk 16:50, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

OK, thanks for that @Thomas.W: with all the reverting I didn't know what the consensus was. Thanks.  Seagull123  Φ  17:05, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Yes, thank you. I hadn't noticed that either. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:49, 5 July 2015 (UTC)