Talk:Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity/Archive 1

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Cleanup?

The cleanup tag was placed when I had only written the titles of the chapters, and so may not apply anymore. That said, I'm not certain whether my chapter-based format is the most effective layout for wikipedia. Thoughts?--Heyitspeter 21:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

i assume the cleanup tag can go. my only suggestion (knowing next to nothing of rorty) is to expand with a section on the work's reception. ⇒ bsnowball 16:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

GA status?

I don't know exactly how this is done, but if possible I'd like to nominate this article for Good Article status. It is rad clear to the layman.Martin McCarvill 17:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

I second that - whoever wrote this did one hell of a good job. Thanks. The only problem now is that I'm not sure I need to read the book. This is Cliff Notes on steroids. KTyson (talk) 17:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! I had some free time and I love the book. It's worth a read, even after a synopsis. I obviously didn't include everything here. :) --Heyitspeter (talk) 01:36, 18 December 2008 (UTC)