Talk:Constitutionalist Liberal Party

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Central America

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Central America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Central America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Central AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Central AmericaCentral America articles

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as High-importance).

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled[edit]

Shouldn't this article be called "Constitutionalist Liberal Party"? Silverhelm 17:33, 14 September 2005 (UTC).[reply]

You're right. the official name of the party is "Constitutionalist Liberal Party" (Partido Liberal Constitucionalista) Magicartpro 23:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page moved, per request. -GTBacchus^(talk) 06:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Liberal International[edit]

Does anyone know why PLC left the Liberal International? --Soman 19:40, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The LI considered (in 2005) that the PLC was not a Liberal Party by their standards. The ALN was accepted as an observer in the LI in Sept. 2006. The PLC was (at the time of their expulsion) also an observer in the LI, not a full member. Magicartpro 23:15, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, shouldn't The Constitutionalist Liberal Party take out the word 'Liberal'? Here in the United States, we associate the word liberal with the ideals of "Socialism" and "Communism". I thought that the Constitutionalist Liberal Party want to follow the ideals of "Capitalism", but within a democratic country. When the Somoza family was in control of Nicaragua, I saw them as being 'Capitalist Dictators'. That's wrong. Capitalism should be practiced in a democracy. Just as Socialism should be practiced in a democracy. That is why I suspect Daniel Ortega of being a 'Socialist Dictator'!! He is acting just like Somoza did!! Thank you. Rgustitis@hotmail.com 76.121.99.198 (talk) 17:01, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 20 rally[edit]

I removed this information from the article, both because it is POV to say that it is the largest political force in Nicaragua based on this, and because this rally may not be important in the long run. Academic Challenger 20:53, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:PLC flag.png[edit]

Image:PLC flag.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Constitutionalist Liberal Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070705174113/http://www.plc.org.ni/ to http://www.plc.org.ni/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]