Talk:Constitutio Antoniniana

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Constitutio Antoniniana article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rome Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

However, it had the unintended effect of allowing provincials the hope of becoming emperor, and of starting uprisings with that hope in mind (the first to do so being Maximinus Thrax only 23 years after this edict). This would play a major factor in the Crisis of the Third Century and the eventual fall of the Roman Empire.

I understand that there are plenty of Pat Buchanan fans out there, but calling Constitutio Antoniana "a major factor" in the eventual downfall of the Western Roman Empire is an unacceptable POV statement - for the counterargument (that the extension of Roman citizenship rights to the entire freeborn population of the Empire was the major reason it even survived the crises of the 3d century) looks, to me, at least as reasonable, if not more so, than the idea that unruly barbarian soldiers were waiting with baited breath to receive their citizenship rights before they decided to rebel. The majority of usurpers, rebels and new emperors continued to be Romans after the passing of Constitutio Antoniana, anyway.

Leave Buchanan's theories out of historical articles: the Roman armies by themselves were unruly, undisciplined and violent enough by the beginning of the 3d century to make any bemoaning over the "barbarization" of Rome a farce.

The stated reason for Caracalla to declare this edict, was to increase the number of worshipers of Roman gods. It was exempt from including the dediticii into citizenship, which the definition is unclear. Regardless of the reasons behind the edict, Citizenship was no longer a privilege or an incentive. Sfgator (talk) 17:05, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Constitutio Antoniniana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120831060912/http://web.upmf-grenoble.fr:80/Haiti/Cours/Ak/ to http://web.upmf-grenoble.fr/Haiti/Cours/Ak

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]