Talk:Connie Mack III

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Name[edit]

Is his legal name "McGillicuddy" or is it "Mack"? I am under the impression that the original Connie Mack changed his name and so "Mack" is his actual name and not just a nickname. Acsenray 15:22, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thirteen years later than the post above, I have the same question: are we supposed to believe that the baseball manager changed his name from McGillicuddy to Mack, then the family changed it back to McGullicuddy, then the senator changed it again? That makes no sense. Purplethree 16:31, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia article on the original Connie Mack indicates that he never legally changed his name. From visits to Find-a-Grave, it seems that some members of the family go by "McGillicuddy" and others (particularly the politicians) use the "Mack" name, either for convenience or to exploit its prominence. It's probably best to investigate whichever particular member of the family you're interested in, to see what they go by. Rontrigger 10:05, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am having much difficulty reading this {& related articles}. The name issue overwhelms. Also, He has a grandfather, he has a son; but, he has no parent, neither father, nor mother? If either is listed, it is not apparent, to me. If it is there, could it be clarified, please?

Thank You,

[[ hopiakuta Please do sign your signature on your message. ~~ Thank You. -]] 02:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV Language/Style Issue[edit]

I noticed that as this article progresses toward the bottom, the language used becomes more flattering to the subject and there is exponentially more focus on promotional talking points that one might find on a campaign website. Use of phrases like "landmark legislation" and "numerous awards" and "helped to establish" can even seem so vague, yet overtly positive in tone as to be a marketing or campaign effort. Did nobody ever disagree with this person on any topic? Forgive me if I've done anything wrong in terms of adding the NPOV tag in brackets at the top of the article page or if this current note was to be placed elsewhere on the talk page. I always have trouble figuring out how these things are done on here. Thanks.
98.203.17.49 (talk) 03:51, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added the peacock tag to the Tenure section, as that's where most of the questionable material is, and also flagged missing citations throughout that section. 208.163.133.252 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:24, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to take the tag off the top of the article and leave the one on the Tenure section. Swliv (talk) 00:47, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Connie Mack III. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:29, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]