Talk:Columbia Global Reports

A fact from Columbia Global Reports appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 January 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Columbia University's small press Columbia Global Reports has been described as "somewhere between a magazine and book publisher"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Columbia Global Reports.

Wikipedia

DYK nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 03:28, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Columbia University's small press Columbia Global Reports has been described as "somewhere between a magazine and book publisher"? "Columbia Global Reports sits somewhere between a magazine and book publisher." [1]Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
- ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Sarah Cooper: Everything's Fine

Created/expanded by HouseOfChange (talk). Self-nominated at 22:51, 2 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General eligibility:

New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting:
Other problems:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

It's a very short article, but it is technically long enough -- it feels within the letter and the spirit of the DYK rules. The hook is a decent one; I had some questions about publisher vs. press vs. imprint, but I've talked myself out of it. Nice topic for an encyclopedia. No concerns. Josh Milburn (talk) 13:46, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]