This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This is a messy situation because the Dictionary of Ohio Historic Places was published with the invalid ISBN 10 0-403-09982-6, and another book, Encyclopedia of Missouri, was published with the valid ISBN 10 0-403-09982-X, differing only in the last (checksum) digit. The ISBN 13 recently supplied, 978-0-403-09982-5, would be a correct, valid extrapolation of both ISBN 10s (both books were published before ISBN 13 became the standard, so neither book, as far as I can tell, was actually published with that number), and a Google search on that ISBN 13 produces results for both books. But if a user follows the search link in the article, all of the results are for the Missouri book (the one that had the correct ISBN 10 in the first place). Using the invalid ISBN 10 produces only one result at Worldcat, but at least it is the correct book.--ShelfSkewedTalk 03:50, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
