Talk:Climax, Minnesota

Here is a link to a USA Today article about the superintendent and the ban. I am not sure how the formatting should work, so I did not add it myself. http://www.usatoday.com/news/offbeat/2004-02-13-town-shirts_x.htm 207.67.73.40 (talk) 16:44, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Founding date

In this edit, I reverted the collective effect of three edits changing the founding date. I made the revert during a WP:Huggle session after briefly having seen only the third of the three edits and seeing that it apparently mangled the footnoted cite by removing the closing <ref> tag. Huggle reverted the series of three edits, not just the final edit.

The reverted editor questioned this on my talk page, and I took a closer look at this. I see

• Before the reverted edits were made, this older version of the article said that the town had been founded in 1896, and was named after a chewing tobacco company.Cited as a supporting source was "Minnesota Place Names - Township and Village Information". Minnesota Place Names. Minnesota Historical Society. Retrieved 21 May 2011.
• After the reverted edits but before the revert (disregardng the missing </ref> tag), the article would have said that the town had been founded June 10, 1871 by Ole & Ingrid Estenson and was named after a chewing tobacco company. This PDF of a page from this 1976 edition of Pioneers of the Valley, a publication of the Polk County Historical Society, was cited in support.

I suggest that regular editors of this article come to a consensus here about what the article ought to say and what source or sources ought to be cited in support, considering WP:DUE. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:59, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Ha

What, no mention of the famous Fertile woman? Sca (talk) 15:10, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Climax, Minnesota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721034521/http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_PL_GCTPL2.ST13&prodType=table to http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_PL_GCTPL2.ST13&prodType=table
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/68hmXDfkx?url=http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt to http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:17, 26 November 2016 (UTC)