Talk:Clayton Donaldson/GA1

GA Reassessment

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. Please make sure that the article is constantly updated to ensure it remains up to date with his career. A number of non-essential suggestions are given below as pointer to improve the article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, --Jackyd101 (talk) 10:38, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

Prose is pretty good, probably an 8/10.

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

I'd like to see more about his parentage, childhood and personal life. This is very skimpy in the article and requires improvement. Has he ever been in the media regarding his personal life? --Jackyd101 (talk) 10:38, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail: