Talk:Clayton & Shuttleworth

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Clayton & Shuttleworth article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Lincolnshire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shuttleworth DAB page[edit]

Some time back, before this article existed, I added the following to the Shuttleworth page:

Joseph Shuttleworth (1819-1883), partner with Nathaniel Clayton in Clayton & Shuttleworth, builders of portable engines and agricultural machinery in Lincolnshire, England

This has recently been removed, probably because of the red link?

Just thought I'd mention it here for when someone creates a page for Joseph Shuttleworth.

-- EdJogg (talk) 14:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Link to Shuttleworth collection[edit]

A relative of the Founder of the company Richard Shuttleworth founded the Shuttleworth Collection of aircraft and machinery at Old Warden in Bedfordshire. Old Warden park hosts the annual Bedfordshire Steam Rally. This could be worked in but not sure were. - BulldozerD11 (talk) 22:02, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure the connection is really notable to the company. MilborneOne (talk) 22:25, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have to agree there, what would be the significance to the link? Related in what way?--BSTemple (talk) 00:00, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

if you consider it insignificant that a flyer who founded a significant collection of early aviation artifacts whose own family built aircraft of the period is not relevant then dont put it in then. Just thought id mention it when the article had popped up on my watch list. - BulldozerD11 (talk) 01:17, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why we can't include it as a 'See also'. There are plenty of pages with much more tenuous links. Here we have a direct family connection, at least, so it is of interest that the (company) name persisted in this way. If the family didn't have the history of building aircraft, would it have established an aircraft museum? (OK, I know you can't answer that one!) -- EdJogg (talk) 10:51, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dont have a problem with a see also link but do we have a reliable source on the relationship between the two? MilborneOne (talk) 16:50, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The see also is okay, and if you could show a clear link, with at least one good reference, it could have been put in the text. But what relation was he? Brother, cousin, son, uncle? Just saying a relative of the Founder, is not clear.--BSTemple (talk) 18:31, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Clayton & Shuttleworth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]