Talk:Chytridiomycosis

	Chytridiomycosis is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fungi Mid‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Veterinary medicine Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veterinary medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicineTemplate:WikiProject Veterinary medicineVeterinary medicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Expert tag[edit]

The page had an {{expert}} tag, but I don't see any explanation on what was the reason or what is needed. If needed, please provide some info. --Ljvillanueva (talk) 06:42, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Global Warming[edit]

"global warming in the region accelerates evaporation, thus raising the air's capacity to hold water. The increased water vapor capacity subsequently enhances the cloud cover over the region, which influences surface temperatures" Is this saying that increases in temperature cause increased cloud cover which in turn cause decrease in temperature? I am not an expert on the subject, but from a layman point of view this argument is flawed. Matushorvath (talk) 09:20, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you, Matushorvath. If the sudden increases in temperature are causing more clouds to appear in the sky, wouldn't that mitigate the global warming and bring us down to colder temperatures? GVnayR (talk) 03:23, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Here are a collection of journal articles studying effects of climate (change), ENSO, and possible connections to chytrid fungus outbreaks in amphibians. Although there are some conflicting conclusions, I recommend adding some of this sourced information to the article. Oct. 2010 (PDF) May. 2010 Mar. 2010 Mar. 2008 May. 2007 Jan. 2007 Jan. 2006 2005. ~A H 1^(TCU) 21:38, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cloud cover[edit]

If the cloud cover that is supposed to protect us from global warming is supposed to be good, how come it's causing a disease to become worse and killing all these amphibians in countries that used to be able to support them? GVnayR (talk) 04:17, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Archey's Frog[edit]

The article states that this frog is immune to infection, and later that this frog was cured. Incompatible statements... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.45.61.51 (talk) 04:27, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to merge/incorporate sections from Batrachochytrium into this one.[edit]

Please see discussion at Talk:Batrachochytrium. Animalparty (talk) 04:33, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent contributions needing improvement[edit]

I reverted recent additions that were factually correct and important information, but that need substantial improvements in tone (neutrality, encyclopedic rather than essay-like), formatting (italics, wikilinks), and referencing. The reverted version can be found here. Again, the information is crucially important, but it is not yet ready for Wikipedia standards. Assistance would be welcome. --Animalparty-- (talk) 17:53, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I have revised and restored much of the above information, feeling more content is better than less, but there is still room for additional cleanup, revision, and expansions.--Animalparty-- (talk) 05:44, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chytridiomycosis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090118233452/http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2006/8051/abstract.html to http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2006/8051/abstract.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Description[edit]

Hello @XeCyranium: This doesn't look redudant to me. There is no other mention of either hypha or zoospore morphology in the lede. In fact there is no other morphological information in the lede. Invasive Spices (talk) 9 February 2022 (UTC)

The sentence appeared to be an artifact from before the identification of the second species, hence the the lack of pluralization and second wiki link to fungus. A chytrid is a type of zoosporic non-hyphal fungus, so it's redundant to call them both. XeCyranium (talk) 01:29, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]