Talk:Church of Saint Quentin, Tournai

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 02:23, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Yakikaki (talk). Self-nominated at 21:20, 2 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is new and long enough copyvio unlikely. For the architectonical jargon, I assume good faith as I do not understand all the terms from the French source. Thanks for the interesting article and hook. As to me it is good to go.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:54, 3 February 2022 (UTC) y[reply]

The source says it was for "St. Pierre", now the angel depicted is at Saint Quentin and St Pierre doesn't appear in the article. How about adding a phrase or two about St.Pierre and its relation with St. Quentin?Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:33, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Paradise Chronicle and thanks for the review! Indeed, the sculptures seem to have moved around a bit, that's why I added the paragraph "They were originally made for another Tournai church but since 2010 they are displayed in Saint Quentin." I don't know the exact story behind the moving of the sculptures, and I'm not sure I can find out, but I'll do my best to investigate further if you want? Or just add that it was made for St. Pierre (St. Peter)? I could also try to add a bit more about the sculptures themselves, I realise I didn't even mention the subject matter of them in the article. Kind regards, Yakikaki (talk) 18:50, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Yakikaki and Paradise Chronicle: can the image be cropped a bit? Can't really make out the details in their face at this resolution and distance... thanks! theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/they) 12:33, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, or perhaps replace it with an alternative one? How about either of these? Sorry if I'm messing things up here with the editing, this is not my forte.
Alternative pic
Alternative pic 2
Ooh, thanks! Those work :) theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/they) 20:16, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Theleekycauldron: OK, I replaced the pic in the DYK nom and in the article with alternative 2. Yakikaki (talk) 23:29, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]