This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
"tolerant" Umayyads? Hmm, why use that adjective, I would leave it out, it's both debatable and besides the point.Cutugno (talk) 18:44, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Another: what does the first footnote mean? De rebus Hispaniae looks like a later Hispanic chronicle in Latin to me. Srnec (talk) 02:32, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The first footnote is tosh. If Chrystys said it, she was dreaming. But I doubt even she would have said that. The De rebus Hispanie (or better, Historia gothica, since that's the title the author gave it) is a History, not strictly speaking a Chronicle (where entries are ordered by date). But there is the ninth-century Chronicle of Alfonso III stitched together with a good deal of imagination in the Asturias, so I think the footnote should be put out of its misery. Hostiensis (talk) 15:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
