Talk:Christa Pike

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Overhaul[edit]

This article needed a massive fix. The name of it is still odd; I don't know how to fix it. I removed a section that read more like an essay or term paper than a Wiki article, but more work should be done on this page. Rockhound (talk) 07:15, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To fix the name, use the Move option. I have just done this to rename the article to a more appropriate title. Dethme0w (talk) 07:17, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV and improper tone tag removal[edit]

I have in-depth knowledge of the details of this case from personal experience. I see nothing in this article that is not factually supported by the record, or by the evidence. Also, the tone does not seem improper to me, unless, of course, one considers the discussion of horrific crimes to be inappropriate as a matter of principle. Discussions of gruesome homicides would naturally be expected to cause concern in most people. I find that the tone of this article sticks closely to the facts. I did however remove the word "allegedly", as that is by definition inappropriate in a case such as this where the allegation was in fact proven in a court of law.

Not sure how the race of tadaryl has anything to do with the crime. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.252.198.143 (talk) 11:06, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have therefore removed the tags, as this article was tagged over 9 months ago without any drastic changes being made in the interim. NDM (talk) 03:31, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nově opravený článek[edit]

Myslíte, že je to takhle lepší?--90.180.12.29 (talk) 01:22, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary sources[edit]

Is a Singapore's English language newspaper really the best source of information regarding an American death penalty case? I imagine that this is not an original piece of journalism, written in Singapore, but picked up off of a wire service.

If possible, the original article should be tracked down so it's clear what newspaper conducted this reporting and analysis. 69.125.134.86 (talk) 16:27, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Christa Pike. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:55, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Christa Pike. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:31, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:37, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sources[edit]

2024 Update[edit]

There was a massive amount of information and updates missing from the years 2021 - current (03/2024).

I did my best to update what information I could find under Scheduled Execution. I included case law link and other links where I could, but I’m not sure I’ve done it right and I know there could be more information linked/added.

If anyone has a chance or a hankering, I would love someone to check it over for grammar and just to make sure it makes sense.

I am completely new to editing more than a simple spelling or grammar mistake so a second set of eyes is always appreciated!

Thank you! Originalmidnightsangel (talk) 22:58, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]