Talk:Chris Curran (actor)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chris Curran (actor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:14, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Date of birth[edit]

On 10 July 2019 Jkaharper added a date of birth of 7 May 1908 to this article, citing a web site (ancestry.co.uk) as the source. However, because this site is behind a pay wall, it cannot be verified. On 18 August 2019 an anonymous editor altered the DOB to 20 June 1924, but provided no source for the change. Although there is apparently no reliable information available in the public domain as to the subject's true DOB, some sources suggest that he was born in the early-1920s (e.g. Sunday Independent, 1 September 1996). Therefore, the more recent edit is probably closer to the truth. Nevertheless, as no source was given, I think the best response is to revert both edits until reliable information is found.Jim Bruce (talk)