Talk:Chinatown Fair

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unclear statement[edit]

From the article:

Unlike the norm at other arcades, where winning players continue until deposed, Chinatown Fair players play a maximum of three or four continuous games.

From the source:

Benjamin Valle, 19, a college student from the Bronx, explains that rather than the usual arcade policy where the winner keeps playing, most players at Chinatown Fair stay on for a maximum of three or four games. “Usually, you run out of money by then anyway,” he adds.

It's unclear what the player meant, or whether the reporter understood his meaning. Why would it matter if you ran out of money if you were able to continue playing on the same quarter? Unless someone can verify with a more direct statement, I don't believe the intended meaning was that the arcade had a different policy of voiding the winner's credit after a number of games. It is not usually a matter of "arcade policy" for the winner to keep playing, that is how the game itself works by default. Ham Pastrami (talk) 12:02, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chinatown Fair. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]